UMaTSpace

Fractional Distillation of Spilled Crude Oil Containing Additional Oleophobic and Oleophilic Impurities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Asante, Ben
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-19T14:30:30Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-19T14:30:30Z
dc.date.issued 2023-08
dc.identifier.citation Asante, B. (2023). Fractional Distillation of Spilled Crude Oil containing Additional Oleophobic and Oleophilic Impurities. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/829
dc.description.abstract Crude oil spillages on the oceans cause huge financial losses to businesses and harm to the environment and the species that depend on the oceans for survival. In order to cut down the losses caused by spillages, decision was made to distill the crude oils for consumption. Before distilling the crude, salt and sulphur had to be removed from it in order to avoid the destruction of the distillation column during fractionation and the emission of sulphur compounds into the atmosphere when the oil is used. Chemical desalting and oxidative extractive desulphurisation methods were used for those processes. The distillation column used in the research was designed and built by the researcher. The crude oil used for the work was obtained from Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) and the seawater was fetched from the New Amanfrom Beach. The crude oil was medium dark sour compound having a density of 900.8 kg/m3 . The American Petroleum Institute (API) index of the crude was 25.47o . Before desalting and desulphurisation, testing the unspilled crude oil for salt and sulphur contents gave 13.2 g/m3 of salt and 3000 ppm of sulphur in the unspilled crude oil. The test of the spilled crude oil also showed 89 g/m3 of salt and 3530 ppm of sulphur contents. After two successive desulphurisation processes, the sulphur in the spilled and the unspilled crude reduced by about 92 % and 88.82 % correspondingly. Similarly, after five desalting processes, the salt in the spilled and the unspilled crude reduced by about 63.13 % and 27.27 % respectively. The samples obtained from the distillation were analysed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometry and Gas Chromatographic /Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The major fractions identified included gasoline, naphtha, kerosene, diesel, fuel oil, and bitumen. The value of the API, the size of the distillation column, the relative volatility of the crude components, and the surface area for the vapour and liquid available in column influenced the fractions obtained. The total energy consumed to fractionate the 2 liters of the crude was 1.813 x 103 kJ. The specific energy consumed by the crude fractions are presented in an increasing order as follows: Gasoline, 388 J/g ˂ naphtha, 502.8116 J/g ˂ kerosene, 543.15 J/g ˂ diesel, 611.4441 J/g ˂ fuel oil, 763.7259 ˂ bitumen, 863.2596 J/g. The analysis of the specific energy consumed by the crude oil fractions showed that more energy was needed to fractionate the less volatile crude oil fractions than to fractionate the more volatile crude oil fractions. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa. en_US
dc.subject Fractional Distillation, Oleophobic, Oleophilic Impurities en_US
dc.title Fractional Distillation of Spilled Crude Oil Containing Additional Oleophobic and Oleophilic Impurities en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UMaTSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account